Monday, November 4, 2013

Do you think at this point that the liberal media even has the ability, the capacity to acknowledge or even just simply see that the reason Obama lied about his health care law is because he felt pretty damn confident he could get away with it, felt pretty damn confident that his media cohorts would be there for him and dutifully enable any narrative he might choose to spin - and that the only reason this scheme hasn't worked out is because they so badly botched the roll out of the website that the Jon Stewarts et al felt they had no choice but to actually god forbid speak the truth or else risk being made to look utterly ridiculous? What objective observer doesn't believe that if that website were running at merely let's say a measly 25% efficiency that that would have been judged good enough for most of the liberal media and that they accordingly would have obediently backed up Obama's lies in much the same way the NY Times, which apparently has abandoned notions of shame altogether, just did, claiming in an op-ed that Dear Leader didn't lie but merely misspoke - sort of like saying Peter didn't deny Christ, just was having a bad day and misspoke a few times about knowing that Jesus fella.