How stupid are people? How
utterly blinded by bias is the media? Comey has reopened the Hillary email case
– the leftists are enraged – Comey’s motivations are political! Yes, they
certainly were when he originally refused to recommend charges by interpreting
the applicable statute in a way that was not only highly contrived but also contravened
a Supreme Court ruling that said he couldn’t do what he did. Clearly Obama had
told him that he had no intention of prosecuting Hillary so Comey could either
resign or fabricate some phony conclusion that ‘exonerated’ Clinton – Comey
chose the latter, but then blasted her in a news conference that made it clear
he didn’t agree with his own recommendation. If liberals were worried about the
political corruption of the FBI they had ample opportunity to do so in July –
instead they copiously praised Comey for being such an honorable public
servant.
But now they’re beside
themselves with contempt for the man – and what I keep hearing is since Comey
doesn’t have permission yet to read the Weiner emails how can he possibly know
they’re relevant? Is this stupidity or just a willingness to prevaricate
without remorse? This is what seems clear to me: the FBI has had
Weiner’s computer for almost a month now – they obviously have permission
to look at certain digital correspondence because they’re looking for evidence
that the perv was soliciting sexual favors online from underage girls – the FBI
may indeed not have the right to look at other emails – but agents will have
surely seen the subject titles of other emails – it seems like a safe
bet that what’s happened here is these agents recognized subject titles that
mentioned something that looked classified or that were the same as subject
titles from classified emails that they already have from Clinton’s server – or
both – either that or Huma had sworn that she had turned over all relevant
email and the agents now had good reason to believe that might have been a lie.
They then alerted Comey. That’s my guess as to what’s going on here – yes,
there’s no proof yet that the FBI now has evidence that Hillary knowingly compromised national security
or that she lied about who had access to classified material or that these new
emails will damage her in any way whatsoever [although I’m guessing Huma’s in a
shit load of trouble] – but to think Comey has done this without some strong
indication that it’s legitimate doesn’t seem credible to me – and that strong
indication could easily be gleaned simply from the subject titles of the
relevant emails or the mere presence of emails to and from Hillary – indeed,
the agents combing through Weiner’s digital perversions may have had
instructions to do precisely that: look for stuff that might be applicable to
the Clinton case [although instructions like that may be unconstitutional,
dunno].
It just seems highly
improbable that Comey would reopen
the case without having a good reason to believe that he now possibly had
evidence of a crime committed by either Hillary or Huma that he didn’t have in
July – and that crime would have to be more
serious than the one of ‘gross negligence’ he refused [clearly under pressure
I’d say] to pursue earlier – it just doesn’t make sense otherwise, at least to
me.
