I'm getting a kick out of people slamming Obama for not going to Paris for the 'protest' against terrorism [really, we need to march for things so fucking obvious as terrorism is bad and free speech is good? Seems to me this was just another empty 'bring back our girls' type gesture - although at least the French are actually referring to it as Islamist terrorism] - but I'm getting a kick out of criticism directed at Obama because most of it seems to be of the opinion that this slight was some kind of 'tone deaf' or 'ham-fisted' mess up - why is no one saying that maybe this was a deliberate expression of Obama's uber left ideological sympathies? The uber left abhors the idea of calling the extremism Islamic because they want to blame the West in general and America in particular for this behavior and that's hard to do if you lend credence to the notion there's something inherently Islamist about what's going on - idiotic, sure, but then idiocy is the air they breathe in the delusional echo chambers of the left.
All this time gone by and people still want to think of Obama as this pragmatic moderate - the man is an uber leftist who skillfully uses his protected status with the media to spin false representations and narratives to the contrary - like his uber liberal comrades in the Academy the idea of taking part in a march where terrorism might be linked to Islamism is unthinkable. I mean, c'mon people, wake up - this is the man who labelled the terrorist attack on Fort Hood 'work place violence' and did it with a straight face - there's a reason he sat in Reverend Wright's church all those years - he may not be as radical as Wright [although I would't rule it out] but he's certainly sympathetic to the point of view. Examine the man's words and actions with a clear mind and what you see is an Alinskyite leftist who with cynical cunning knows that if Americans know that's what your are you ain't getting elected or, if you do manage to fool the people into voting for you thanks to a media corrupted by bias, you won't be able to govern because once you've spun a lie that big everything afterwards becomes a function of that falsehood, that deception - which is why he has lost his majority and is now simply going to rule like a King.
All this time gone by and people still want to think of Obama as this pragmatic moderate - the man is an uber leftist who skillfully uses his protected status with the media to spin false representations and narratives to the contrary - like his uber liberal comrades in the Academy the idea of taking part in a march where terrorism might be linked to Islamism is unthinkable. I mean, c'mon people, wake up - this is the man who labelled the terrorist attack on Fort Hood 'work place violence' and did it with a straight face - there's a reason he sat in Reverend Wright's church all those years - he may not be as radical as Wright [although I would't rule it out] but he's certainly sympathetic to the point of view. Examine the man's words and actions with a clear mind and what you see is an Alinskyite leftist who with cynical cunning knows that if Americans know that's what your are you ain't getting elected or, if you do manage to fool the people into voting for you thanks to a media corrupted by bias, you won't be able to govern because once you've spun a lie that big everything afterwards becomes a function of that falsehood, that deception - which is why he has lost his majority and is now simply going to rule like a King.