On second thought I'm beginning to think that Obama's immigration ploy indeed was unconstitutional - the feeling seems to be that the granting of what amounts to a virtual amnesty to so many illegals prevents or makes impossible any individual review of their cases and that that failure or abuse amounts to a de facto rewriting of immigration law and therefore what Obama has done is unconstitutional. I dunno - I ain't no scholar - but it's very hard to believe that something so egregiously dictatorial wouldn't be unconstitutional - that seems to insult common sense.
