"… I never said I was opposed to gay marriage… I said it made no sense to equate traditional notions of marriage with gay marriage unless one is willing to also admit or accept that by forcibly superimposing the one over the other you're officially saying that marriage is no longer about the making of babies… the making of babies understand, not simply just the having of families, two states suggesting entirely different existential implications regardless of their similarities… and what I said is if we are as a society ready to admit that the meaning of marriage has indeed substantially changed to one defined much more by love and much less by the making of babies then we should continue this bout of honesty and move onto the next logical conclusion to be drawn from that, to wit, if marriage is now mainly about an expression of love, then why the hell should the government be involved in it?… but of course we're not having that conversation and probably never will because the whole point of gay marriage activism was always political and if you take away the political component gay marriage becomes a meaningless thing, a utility robbed of value for the ever over wrought left… and so you see gay marriage no matter how one frames it within current parameters, assuming of course one is being unbiasedly honest and not twisted by zealotry into jargon or sophistry or outright lying, is an absurdity masquerading as enlightenment because liberal ideologues are desperate to keep alive the belief that they have seen the future and it's them and y'all better get in line because alternative opinions will not be tolerated since such might jeopardize a future perfection that, for the righteous left, has already been determined..."
