Well, obviously these obervations do not shock me with bitter surprise - although the article gives rise to a bitterness of sorts knowing how Obama has avoided the criticism he so thoroughly deserves for the mess that is Libya. Just a few days ago the Washington Post wrote an op-ed about how the lies of Benghazi were just molehills wrought into mountains by the delusions of right wing fanatics. This is the Washington Post, for christ sake, talking as if it's no big deal a president getting the country involved in a war that made no sense at all, without bothering to ask the congress if they minded much his 'humanitarian' caprice, then fighting that war in a completely asinine way which results in leaving behind an Islamist mess that he and the catamite press ignores - which is the exact reason why they had to lie about what really happened in Benghazi, lies which the press allowed to go forward because otherwise it might cost their precious Dear Leader his reelection - and the Washington Post for christ sakes thinks complaints about this sad state of affairs is all much ado about nothing, noise on the margins. Unbelievable.
These people are either drunk on the fumes of an ideological fervor that should deeply trouble any clear minded, unbiased thinker - or they're clumsily trying to divert attention from a gross miscarriage of justice and policy and the deceits thereof that they endorsed and abetted and contributed to - or they're idiots.
